|
Christian Resources Library
Beliefs and Business:
the experience of Quaker Companies
Sir Adrian Cadbury
A talk in the Faith Seeking Understanding series - May 2003
Background
Few are aware of the extent of Quaker involvement in business in the
18th and 19th centuries. Some may know that the four main chocolate
companies - Cadbury, Fry, Rowntree and Terry - were all Quaker businesses
in their origin. Quaker leadership, however, covers a wide range of
industry and commerce of the period. The iron and steel industry of
the country owes its origin to the Darbys of Coalbrookdale (don't miss
a chance to visit Ironbridge) and to Huntsman of Sheffield (steel).
Our railway system began with the Pease's of Darlington, who ran the
first train from Stockton to Darlington in 1825 on what became known
as the Quaker Line. To know what train to catch, you consulted Bradshaw's
- he was another Quaker. Banking was dominated by the Quakers. Lloyds
were bankers and ironmasters and all the founding families of Barclays
were Quakers. In addition, the majority of the country banks were Quaker
owned and run.
They were involved in brewing. Although much concerned with the scourge
of cheap spirits, brewing ale was considered acceptable. Barclay Perkins
were the main Quaker brewers and that business was formed when Mrs Thrale
sold the Anchor Brewery in which Dr Johnson was an investor. She famously
wrote about the sale, "God Almighty sent us a knot of rich Quakers
who bought the whole and saved me and my coadjutors (which included
Dr Johnson) from brewing ourselves into another bankruptcy".
The Quaker influence extends to shoes - Clark's of Street, K of Kendal
and Morlands of Glastonbury, to pharmacy - Allen and Hanbury, to chemicals
- Albright & Wilson and Sturge, to matches - Bryant & May, to
food - Huntley & Palmers, Carr's Biscuits, Reckitt's and Horniman's
Tea, to engineering - Ransome's of Ipswich, and they are just examples
taken from a much longer list.
The remarkable thing is that in 1800 Quakers were only 1 in 500 of
the population. Thus 0.2% of those living in the country played an important
part in the transformation of Britain into an industrial nation.
Why were they in business?
One reason was that they were debarred from any official positions,
from most of the professions and from going to university because of
their religious beliefs. With the restoration of the monarchy, a number
of laws were passed in the 1660s to prevent those outside the Church
of England from having positions of influence. They suffered persecution
and particular problems were their refusal to swear oaths and to pay
tithes to the Church. Their refusal to swear meant they would not take
the Oath of Allegiance to the Crown which could be interpreted as disloyalty,
if not treason.
Industry and commerce were therefore outlets for people with drive
and energy and who, in religious terms, thought for themselves. They
were also educated, largely through their own efforts, since they all
learnt to read and write in order to spread the word. They were not
however the only group who were considered outsiders, since Catholics
suffered from the same disabilities, but this did not lead them to any
extent into the field of business. Looking at the particular beliefs
of Quakers helps to explain why, having entered business, they took
the lead in so many fields. It is however impossible to separate the
kind of people who became Quakers from the beliefs which brought them
to join the Society of Friends. It is the combination of the two which
accounts for their remarkable record of business leadership.
Quaker Beliefs
The Society was founded by George Fox in 1650. His revelation was that
the divine presence was within him. This inspired him to preach that
there was, in his words, "That of God in every man", which
led him and his followers to look for personal guidance from that Inward
Light. This self-reliance meant that there was no need for appointed
ministers, or for creeds or sacraments. They preached equality, all
were equally children of God and members of a universal brotherhood.
The established order felt threatened by this revolutionary approach
which did away with hierarchies and which did not recognise worldly
honours, distinctions or claims of office, since honour lay with God
alone. They were therefore persecuted by those in authority well into
the 18th century.
Relevance of their beliefs to business
1) They inspired trust. This was linked to their refusal to swear on
oath. Their refusal was based on the biblical injunction against swearing,
but fundamentally, on the basis that there could not be two standards
of truth. Truth was truth. This led to their success as bankers, because
banking depends on trust. It also meant that as shopkeepers they put
the price on their goods at which they intended to sell them. This was
in contrast to the prevailing custom of haggling over prices. It was
an ethical approach but also good business - and resented by their competitors!.
Most people prefer to know they are not being fleeced, rather than to
have to bargain to achieve the same end.
2) They saw life as a whole; religion was not just for Sundays. One
of the Queries Quakers are asked to consider, is: "Do you maintain
strict integrity in your business transactions and in your relations
with individuals and organizations? Are you personally scrupulous and
responsible in the use of money entrusted to you, and are you careful
not to defraud the public revenue?" They must be unusual among
Christian groups in giving specific advice on business ethics. As a
result, they supported each other and kept an eye on fellow Quaker business
people, to maintain their reputation. When my great-great-grandfather
came to Birmingham in 1794, to open his draper's shop in Bull Street,
he went to Bull Street Meeting and met Sampson Lloyd to whom he had
an introduction. The firm has banked with Lloyds ever since.
3) Oddly enough their unwillingness to support war opened up business
opportunities. The Darbys did not as ironmasters make cannon during
the Napoleonic wars like their competitors. Instead, they developed
a whole range of domestic ironware which turned out to be a far bigger
and more stable business than armaments.
4) Their respect for the worth of every individual influenced the way
in which their businesses were managed. I saw many instances of this
at Bournville. It encouraged the view that everyone's contribution to
the business was of value. This made for good working relations. Suggestions
for improvements were welcomed and followed up, whatever their source.
Because of their belief in equal worth, women played an important role
in Quaker affairs from the outset. The same was true in our company
where, in Edward Cadbury's day, women's departments were managed by
women to ensure that they had a fair share of managerial posts. I have
no doubt that the firm gained greatly from the belief that everyone
working there had something of value to offer the enterprise.
5) Another belief was the importance of arriving at decisions by agreement.
Voting could mean that the views of minorities were disregarded and
overridden. The aim was to arrive at a "sense of the meeting".
In industrial relations, which was my field in the firm, it often meant
considerable time spent in debate and argument, but it also meant that
decisions once arrived at could be implemented quickly and with commitment.
6) The encouragement to look for a better way forward, rather than
accept the world as it is, stemmed from the belief that you should follow
the Divine Light within yourself. It made Quakers ready to challenge
accepted practices and to innovate. The spirit of innovation was unintentionally
assisted by one of the laws passed to keep Quakers and other dissenters
in their place. The Five Mile Act of 1665 meant that Quakers needed
to live more than five miles from established towns and cities, if they
were to worship and to go about their trades freely. Birmingham was
such place and so became a centre for Quakers and nonconformists. There
they had the advantage that they were not bound by the restrictions
imposed by the guilds over matters like apprenticeships and methods
of working. They were free to invent new products and new methods of
production. A good example is Robert Ransome, whose firm makes lawnmowers
to this day. In 1803, he invented the self-sharpening plough, which
kept its edge as it wore. Then in 1808, to meet the problem that farmers
tended to break their ploughs all at the same time at the beginning
of the season, he produced ploughs made of interchangeable parts. They
could be quickly repaired by inserting new parts, instead of his having
to repair the whole plough on site. In effect, he invented the process
of mass production used by Ford to make his cars.
7) The Quakers respected education. They were excluded from much of
the formal educational system. It was not until 1871 that Quakers and
Catholics could enter Oxford or Cambridge. They started their own schools
and needed to be literate if they were to carry out their mission. As
a Quaker history rather stuffily puts it, their belief in education
and study, "was an advantageous factor in the quality of mind of
an important portion of their labour." Thus they benefited to the
extent that they employed fellow-Quakers. Again their approach to learning
was not bound by ancient custom. William Penn on leaving for America
in 1682 set out his views on how his children should be educated:
"For their learning be liberal
but let it be useful
knowledge, such as is consistent with Truth and godliness
..I recommend
the useful parts of mathematics, as building houses or ships, measuring,
surveying, dialing, navigation, but agriculture is especially in my
eye: let my children be husbandmen and housewives, it is industrious,
healthy, honest and of good example, like Abraham and the holy ancients,
who pleased God and obtained a good report."
That is a good note on which to finish and anyone who is interested
to learn more about the Quaker way of life could not do better than
to read, Quaker by Convincement by Geoffrey Hubbard, first published
by Penguin in 1974, ISBN 0 14 02.1663 4.
Sir Adrian Cadbury
|